After Reading Aquinas! “Everyone” knows that recently there has been quite a furor created by the claims of J. V. Fesko (Reforming Apologetics—Retrieving the Classical Reformed Approach to Defending the Faith), Keith Mathison (Christianity and Van...
Presuppositional Ponderings after Reading Thomas Aquinas, part 7
Calvin and Aquinas Contrasted Yet More! Fourth, there is a very different view of the usefulness of philosophy espoused by Thomas in contrast to Calvin. Thomas cites with admiration “the philosopher,” Aristotle, throughout his works and certainly in his...
Presuppositional Ponderings after Reading Thomas Aquinas, part 6
More Contrasts between Calvin and Aquinas! Second, Calvin emphasizes explicitly and repeatedly the effect of the fall on man’s knowledge of God. Though men have a naturally implanted knowledge of God given to them by and in creation, this knowledge never...
Presuppositional Ponderings after Reading Thomas Aquinas, part 5
Calvin and Aquinas Contrasted Richard Muller is well-known for books like Unaccommodated Calvin. I had to read that book back in the days when I was studying for my PhD. Muller’s point (or at least one of his main points) was that the contrast between...
Presuppositional Ponderings after Reading Thomas Aquinas, part 4
They Just Keep Missing the Point In my view those currently attacking Van Til and presuppositionalism are engaged in a gigantic enterprise of missing the point. They keep interpreting Romans 1:18-23 wrongly, over and over and again and again! To put it differently,...
Presuppositional Ponderings after Reading Thomas Aquinas, part 3
Aquinas’ Inadequate Views of Noetic Depravity Van Til and presuppositionalism object to Aquinas’s approach to natural theology and apologetics. One major reason given for this is that Thomism exhibits an over-confidence in fallen human reason. Does Thomas over-rate...
Presuppositional Ponderings after Reading Thomas Aquinas, part 2
Why are we privileging Aquinas over Augustine? One of the first things that became very clear to me as I read Aquinas was that with respect to the whole issue of apologetics and the proofs for the existence of God, he does not agree with Augustine, Anselm, and many...
Presuppositional Ponderings after Reading Thomas Aquinas, part 1
After Reading Aquinas! “Everyone” knows that recently there has been quite a furor created by the claims of J. V. Fesko (Reforming Apologetics—Retrieving the Classical Reformed Approach to Defending the Faith), Keith Mathison (Christianity and Van...
J. V. Fesko’s Reforming Apologetics—Retrieving the Classical Reformed Approach to Defending the Faith—A Critical Review (4 of 4)
Part 1: Preface Part 2 Introduction Part 3: Overview Evaluation Commendation There is certainly much that is challenging in Fesko’s work. There is definitely much to be learned. Furthermore, given the directions Reformed historiography has taken in...
J. V. Fesko’s Reforming Apologetics—Retrieving the Classical Reformed Approach to Defending the Faith—A Critical Review (3 of 4)
part 1 , part 2 Overview Reforming Apologetics consists of an introduction and eight chapters. The introduction provides a survey of the book with the intention of summarizing its argument. The first three chapters have for their purpose the rehabilitation of...