Why the Prediction That Christ Would Come May 21 Was Wrong (Part 8 of 8)

by | May 31, 2011 | Current Events, Eschatology

I have one final observation to make on this whole debacle.

When those who profess to be Bible-believing Christians with bold face claim to be able to decipher the time of Christ’s coming, we are apt to assume that the Bible must not be clear about this issue. If so many professing Christians over so many centuries have predicted the time of Christ’s return, and if so many well-meaning Christians have listened to them, then the Bible must not be clear on this. The Bible must open the door to it.

But let me ask you a question, Is the Bible clear that no one can and no one ought to attempt to predict of the time of Christ’s return? Yes. Then what is the problem? Is the problem with the Bible? Is the problem with the clarity of Scripture? Is the problem with the sufficiency of Scripture? May we conclude that the Bible is an inadequate guide on this matter? That is the way men are apt to argue. That is what men are apt to conclude. But all such suspicions are wrong. The problem is not with the Bible. The Bible is clear, and it is sufficient!

The problem is with us. The problem is that we human beings are not very good listeners. The problem is that we are like that rude person who incessantly presumes to finish our sentences for us. Let me end this message with a simple plea. I will address it to myself, but you make the application to yourself. Sam, would just shut up and let God finish what He is saying? Sam, would you just be quiet and listen. Sam, would you stop trying to finish God’s sentences for Him and listen—really listen—to what He has to say!

Follow Us In Social Media

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe via Email

Sign up to get notified of new CBTS Blog posts.


Man of God phone
Why is Theonomy Unbiblical?

Why is Theonomy Unbiblical?

Before critiquing theonomy, we need a good definition. Some people today who use the word “theonomy” don’t mean anything more than “God’s law” because the etimology of the word theonomy is “theos” which means God, and “nomos” which means law. They only want to affirm that God’s law is supreme over man’s law. And they’re right about that. God’s transcendent moral law is the norm that norms all norms. Governmental laws should always be consistent with God’s law and human law must never violate God’s law.

But in this post, I’ll be using the word “theonomy” in a more technical sense, which is rooted in the historic usage of the term.

A Post-Logue to #DatPostmil? Blog Posts

A Post-Logue to #DatPostmil? Blog Posts

It is always a humbling and learning experience to read the responses to a blog series on a controversial subject. Iron does sharpen iron, as the Bible says, and I learn much from those responses. Some postmils have taken a little umbrage at my description of Postmillennialism as a millennium involving a distinct, golden age following the one in which we live.

John Owen—A Caveat, parts 1-13

John Owen—A Caveat, parts 1-13

  Part 1 Caveat comes from the Latin cavere.  The verb in Latin means to be on guard.  I am using its English descendant caveat to mean a warning or caution.  Such is my esteem for John Owen that I prefer the softer idea of caution. John Owen has attained (and not...

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This