We distribute a book as a Seminary that I helped to write and edit many years ago. It is entitled, In Defense of Parity. In that short volume, I with a few other men defend the notion (which many of us hold as Reformed Baptists) that there is no official distinction...
Conclusion If Owen was indeed wrong as we have seen, what can we learn from this fact? It is to answer this question that I have taken so much time to firmly disagree with the properly revered John Owen. I believe there is something to be learned from the...
So far, I have covered seven points in my case against John Owen’s preterist view of 2 Peter 3. Let me add another argument in this post. Here is my eighth objection to Owen’s exegesis. The Conclusive Case against Owen’s Interpretation Continued The whole Olivet...
So far, I have covered six points in my case against John Owen’s preterist view of 2 Peter 3. Let me add another argument in this post. Here is my seventh objection to Owen’s exegesis. The Conclusive Case against Owen’s Interpretation Continued Owen assumes that the...
So far, I have covered five points in my case against John Owen’s preterist view of 2 Peter 3. Let me add another argument in this post. Here is my sixth objection to Owen’s exegesis. The Conclusive Case against Owen’s Interpretation Continued Owen takes 2 Peter 3:4...
So far, I have covered three points in my case against John Owen’s preterist view of 2 Peter 3. Let me add a fourth in this post. The Conclusive Case against Owen’s Interpretation Continued Owen takes Isaiah 65:17f. as a reference to the present...
So far I have covered three points in my case against John Owen’s preterist view of 2 Peter 3. Let’s add a fourth in this post. The Conclusive Case against Owen’s Interpretation Continued Owen takes the words of verse 4 (“the promise of His Parousia”) as a reference...
In the last post I mentioned the first two points of my case against Owen’s preterist interpretation of 2 Peter 3, here I add a further argument in my case. The Conclusive Case against Owen’s Interpretation Continued Owen takes Luke 21:34, 36 as a reference to the...
In my last couple of posts I tried to lay out fairly what I understand both the explicit extent of Owen’s argument for a preterist interpretation of 2 Peter 3 and also the inferential implications of that argument. My purpose, I admit, was not only to help my readers...
In my last post I attempted to emphasize several of the explicit assertions of Owen regarding 2 Peter 3. In this post I want to suggest that there are several natural inferences or implications of Owen’s argument that need to be carefully weighed. The Inferential...
-transparent+cropped.png)
Join our mailing list to receive the latest news and updates from CBTS.