Implications of the Covenant of Grace | 1689 7:2 | Sam Waldron

by | Feb 16, 2023 | Covenant Theology, Systematic Theology

In the last blog on chapter 7 of the 1689 (which you can find here:, I underscored that the disagreements between the Baptists and their Puritan friends over covenant theology did not include disagreement over the fundamental issue of the covenant of works or life. Even when we move into paragraph 2 of chapter 7, the unity between them continues to emerge. Here is what it says:

“Moreover, man having brought himself under the curse of the law by his fall, it pleased the Lord to make a covenant of grace, wherein he freely offereth unto sinners life and salvation by Jesus Christ, requiring of them faith in him, that they may be saved; and promising to give unto all those that are ordained unto eternal life, his Holy Spirit, to make them willing and able to believe.”

2LCF 7:2

The “moreover” with which this paragraph begins assumes the fact of the breaking of the covenant of works. In agreement with the Reformed, the Baptists set beside the covenant of works a covenant of grace by which God determined to restore fallen mankind to a place of favor in His sight and put them into possession of the eternal life they had forfeited by breaking the covenant of works.

Though one may say that in the voluntary condescension of the covenant of works, there had been a kind of “grace,” it was nothing like the grace now bestowed on mankind by the covenant of grace. A new Adam or federal head, Jesus Christ, would be provided to keep this covenant for mankind. This eternal life now bestowed is not conditioned on personal, perfect, and perpetual obedience, but it is freely offered on the basis of what this new Adam achieved. Even the necessary believing reception of this free offer is a gift of the sovereign grace secured by Jesus Christ. The Holy Spirit is sent to make them willing and able to believe.

Though the principles at the basis of the covenant of grace are the same as those in the covenant of works, the grace contained in it for sinners is vastly different than the voluntary condescension of the covenant of works. It is freely offered and sovereignly bestowed.

There have been not a few who could not hold together what the Confession here juxtaposes. They have thought that if salvation is sovereignly bestowed somehow this contradicts it being freely offered. But the Confession here clearly teaches the free offer of the gospel. This doctrine means that God offers, invites, and commands all who hear the gospel the salvation which it promises. This offer is not just for the elect. How can God desire and command what He has not chosen to include in His eternal decree? That perhaps is a mystery beyond our comprehension. We only know that it is true.

It is not, however, different from many other things. God by His will of precept commands many things that He does not will by His will of decree. God’s will of precept was disobeyed by the brothers of Joseph when they sold him into slavery, but this very act fulfilled God’s will of decree. Cf. Genesis 50:20. These two dimensions of God’s one will seem contrary to us finite creatures, but they are not. And neither is the free offer of the gospel to all contradicted by the election of only some. Matthew 22:14 makes this clear: “For many are called, but few are chosen.” We must preach to all that God sincerely calls them. He wants and commands them to repent and believe the gospel.

Follow Us In Social Media

Subscribe via Email

Sign up to get notified of new CBTS Blog posts.

Man of God phone
Are all sins the same? | Tom Hicks

Are all sins the same? | Tom Hicks

“Is it true that all people are equally sinful? If someone has sinful anger in his heart, but never acts on it, is that person really the same as someone who has sinful anger in his heart and then murders his whole family?”

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This