This will be my eleventh and last post on this subject. I continue my critical review of Lee Irons exposition of Romans 2:13.
Search Results
Is There a Future Justification by Works at the Day of Judgment? # 10
I interrupt this response to Lee Irons to comment on one of the several responses to my eighth blog on this subject.
Is There a Future Justification by Works at the Day of Judgment? # 9
Thank you, gentleman, for your interest and comments. They are most instructive. After some interruption I continue hear my critique of Irons’ paper entitled, Is Romans 2:13 Coherent? The page numbers are reference to his online paper.
Is There a Future Justification by Works at the Day of Judgment? # 8
In previous posts I have carefully refrained from commenting on Romans 2:13 and its statement that the doers of the law will be justified.
Is There a Future Justification by Works at the Day of Judgment? # 7
Galatians 5:5-6, 2 Timothy 4:7-8, and Hebrews 11:7 also speak of righteousness in the context of the day of judgment.
Is There a Future Justification by Works at the Day of Judgment? # 3
Matthew 12:33-37
Is There a Future Justification by Works at the Day of Judgment? # 2
Lee Irons in his article Romans 2:13: Is Paul Coherent? argues that Romans 2:13 is a hypothetical or “empty set” assertion.
Is There a Future Justification by Works at the Day of Judgment? # 1
As some of you know I wrote my doctoral dissertation in defense of the traditional, Protestant doctrine of justification.