Since Coxe played a major role in the formulation of the 2nd LCF and since his federalism is clear and in substantial agreement with the federal theology of his day, then, if contemporary, confessional Reformed Baptists confess the things most surely believed among us, then shouldn’t they confess Coxe’s federalism?
Search Results
The Law in the thought of those worth hearing: Conclusion
Part I: The Perpetuity of the Decalogue under the New Covenant in Owen and Others Part II: Matthew 5:17 and the...
Are Christians under the third use of the law?
"Strictly speaking, the idea that believers are under the third use of the law is mistaken..." (Thomas R. Schreiner,...
Psalm 119:1-8 in biblical-theological perspective
How does Psalm 119 relate to Christ?
The Law in the thought of those worth hearing: Part IV
From the evidence presented, Owen must be understood to view abrogation as both including and not including the Decalogue, depending on how it is viewed. If this is the case, his understanding of abrogation, though with its own nuances and emphases, has clear and ample precedent in Calvin, Ursinus, Turretin, and Protestant Scholasticism.
Hermeneutical Implications of Canonical Structure
Subsequent revelation often makes explicit what was only implicit in antecedent revelation.
Review of Rooker’s The Ten Commandments
The Ten Commandments: Ethics for the Twenty-First Century Mark F. Rooker (Nashville: B&H Publishing Group, 2010,...
Canonical structure of the New Testament
Canonical structure of the English Bible Canonical Structure of the OT – 2 (the Hebrew Bible) Canonical structure of...
The Law in the thought of those worth hearing: Part III
Owen’s view of the multi-functional utility of the Decalogue comports with his view of abrogation (see below), Jeremiah 31:33, 2 Co. 3:3, and Matthew 5:17, and also with many of his theological contemporaries. There is a way to understand Owen on abrogation which both eliminates the Decalogue from the New Covenant and preserves it (see below). Relatively speaking, as the Decalogue functioned under the Old Covenant, it has been abrogated. Absolutely speaking, as the Decalogue represents and summarily comprehends the Moral Law as to its substance, it has not and cannot be abrogated. It has more than one function.
Canonical Structure of the OT – 2 (the Hebrew Bible)
The end of the Bible is the end or goal of the beginning to which Adam failed to attain.