I interrupt this response to Lee Irons to comment on one of the several responses to my eighth blog on this subject.
Search Results
Sam Waldron
Is There a Future Justification by Works at the Day of Judgment? # 9
Thank you, gentleman, for your interest and comments. They are most instructive. After some interruption I continue hear my critique of Irons’ paper entitled, Is Romans 2:13 Coherent? The page numbers are reference to his online paper.
Is There a Future Justification by Works at the Day of Judgment? # 8
In previous posts I have carefully refrained from commenting on Romans 2:13 and its statement that the doers of the law will be justified.
Is There a Future Justification by Works at the Day of Judgment? # 7
Galatians 5:5-6, 2 Timothy 4:7-8, and Hebrews 11:7 also speak of righteousness in the context of the day of judgment.
Is There a Future Justification by Works at the Day of Judgment? # 6
In Matthew 5:20 Jesus at a pivotal point in His Sermon on the Mount utters the following serious warning…
Is There a Future Justification by Works at the Day of Judgment? # 5
There is a third passage which I believe uses the verb, to justify, to refer to the justification of the believer and his faith by his works.
Is There a Future Justification by Works at the Day of Judgment? # 4
The second passage which uses the verb, to justify, in a way similar to Matthew 12:37, with a different connotation than it has in Romans 3 and 4, and a way which is quite relevant to the idea of a future justification in the day of judgment is James 2:21-26.
Is There a Future Justification by Works at the Day of Judgment? # 3
Matthew 12:33-37
Is There a Future Justification by Works at the Day of Judgment? # 2
Lee Irons in his article Romans 2:13: Is Paul Coherent? argues that Romans 2:13 is a hypothetical or “empty set” assertion.
Is There a Future Justification by Works at the Day of Judgment? # 1
As some of you know I wrote my doctoral dissertation in defense of the traditional, Protestant doctrine of justification.