21 Misunderstandings of Calvinism: Introduction (part 1)

by | Oct 19, 2015 | Reformed Theology, Uncategorized

Recently, I had the privilege of speaking at the Reformation Preaching 2015 Conference.  I was given the delicious, but in some ways difficult topic:  Misunderstandings of Reformed Thinking.  After some thought and seeking counsel, I entitled this message:  21 Misunderstandings of Calvinism.

There are a few things beside the native darkness and pride of the human heart that are a greater danger to the doctrines of grace than the widespread misunderstandings of those doctrines and their implications.  The best solution to these misunderstandings is a study of the Reformed tradition itself and its clear statements about what the Bible does, and does not, teach regarding the doctrines of grace.

Before I addressed this important subject, I gave the conference four points of introduction.  The first of those is the subject of this first post on those 21 misconceptions of Calvinism.

The Sources of These Misunderstandings

I distinguished three sources of misconceptions about Calvinism

The first was Arminian Misrepresentation.  It is unquestionable that both today and in the past history of the church, Arminians have constantly repeated misrepresentations of the doctrines of grace.  While these misrepresentations may have seemed to them the necessary implications of the views of their Calvinist opponents, they were made in many cases in spite of the clearest denials by the Reformed.  It is unfair for anyone to charge their opponents with holding views that they deny even though they seem to be the logical implications of their positions.  It is fair to point out that their views do lead to such implications.  It is not fair to affirm that they hold or believe such implications when they explicitly deny them.

The second was Immature Reaction.  Another source of various misunderstandings of the doctrines of grace comes from the over-reaction of immature Calvinists.  In their new found vision of the absolute sovereignty of God and newly acquired revulsion to the widespread ignorance and denial of God’s sovereignty by professing Christians, it is easy for neophyte Calvinists to make all sorts of extremist statements and adopt all sorts of imbalanced views that time and calm consideration will show are filled with ill-considered assertions and careless implications.  These statements are not the deliberate misrepresentations of Arminians or the calculated presumption of Hyper-Calvinists, but the enthusiastic overstatements of “Young Turks” or “Cage-stage” Calvinists.

The third was Hyper-Calvinist Presumption.  But another and dangerous source of misunderstandings about Calvinism is the historical stream of real Hyper-Calvinism which developed in the centuries following the Reformation.  Yes, there really is such a thing as Hyper-Calvinism!  Of course, Hyper-Calvinism is not five point Calvinism.  That is just Calvinism.  Granted such Hyper-Calvinism scarcely exists anywhere any more.  But its writings and its representatives do exist and pose a constant and, I fear, growing temptation to young, imbalanced Calvinists ready to embrace anything that appears to exalt a sovereign God.  I warn you, then, that everything is not gold that glitters.  Be careful of those who will tell you that the free and well-meant offer of the gospel, the doctrine of common grace, and duty-faith are Arminianism.

Part two

Follow Us In Social Media

Subscribe via Email

Sign up to get notified of new CBTS Blog posts.


Man of God phone

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This